na wer sagt's denn.

DOM 2 Core
This commit is contained in:
dlichteblau
2005-12-11 23:31:36 +00:00
parent 7be80057c5
commit 2b5b61baf1
2 changed files with 6 additions and 5 deletions

View File

@ -70,7 +70,7 @@
validating SAX-like <a
href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/REC-xml-20001006">XML&nbsp;1.0</a>
parser as well as the <a
href="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-DOM-Level-1/level-one-core.html">DOM&nbsp;Level&nbsp;1&nbsp;Core</a>
href="http://www.w3.org/TR/DOM-Level-2-Core/">DOM&nbsp;Level&nbsp;2&nbsp;Core</a>
interfaces.
</p>
@ -90,7 +90,7 @@
<h2>Recent Changes</h2>
<p class="nomargin"><tt>rel-2005-xx-yy</tt></p>
<ul class="nomargin">
<li>Use trivial-gray-streams.</li>
<li>Implemented DOM 2 Core.</li>
<li>
Error handling overhaul: All syntax errors should now be
reported as instances of <tt>well-formedness-violation</tt>. We
@ -98,6 +98,7 @@
</li>
<li>Support internal subset serialization.</li>
<li>Gilbert Baumann has clarified the license as Lisp-LGPL.</li>
<li>Use trivial-gray-streams.</li>
</ul>
<p class="nomargin"><tt>rel-2005-06-25</tt></p>
<ul class="nomargin">

View File

@ -649,15 +649,15 @@ NIL</pre>
<a name="dom"/>
<h2>DOM Notes</h2>
<p>
CXML implements the DOM Level 1 Core interfaces.&nbsp; Explaining
CXML implements the DOM Level 2 Core interfaces.&nbsp; Explaining
DOM is better left to the <a
href="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-DOM-Level-1/level-one-core.html">specification</a>,
href="http://www.w3.org/TR/DOM-Level-2-Core/core.html">specification</a>,
so please refer to the official W3C documents for DOM.
</p>
<p>
However, there is no "standard" DOM mapping for Lisp.&nbsp; DOM
is <a
href="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-DOM-Level-1/idl-definitions.html">specified
href="http://www.w3.org/TR/DOM-Level-2-Core/idl-definitions.html">specified
in CORBA IDL</a>, but it refrains from using object-oriented IDL
features, allowing for a much more natural Lisp implemenation than
the the ordinary IDL/Lisp mapping would.